![]() ![]() ![]() Save a copy with some sharpening and "Duplicate Files" won't detect that as the file is different. When you have an image and save a copy as another name then Duplicate Files will detect that as the file content is the same. When you have an image and save a copy without metadata, then "Duplicate files" won't recognize them as the same as the file content is different. I can't explain how the signature is calculated, but it's done on the file and not on metadata. Hert wrote:"Duplicate Files" will detect duplicates based on the binary file signature. That way, all without a color label or any color except green would still show. Looking in the Advance Filter guide, I didn't see a way to do a negative filter: i.e NOT green. Meanwhile I thought of applying a color label to the ones that are OK, I picked green. I would like to mark them so that they don't appear in the Duplicate and Similar catalog states any more. They represent RAW+JPG pairs or different size versions i.e. ![]() Looks like a lot of work ahead but a great way to cull the detritus form years past.Īs I go through and validate these, some are supposed to be there. Back in the days before a photo catalog, I was cataloging but instead of software, I was creating subfolders by subject or by use.It was wasteful of space but it was a fast way to organize images into manageable groups. What are the specific criteria: filename, ext, size, date, contents?Īs I look at all the duplicates, I'm seeing a trend. If I understand it correctly, from what I see, duplicate is the exact same image stored in multiple locations. Have already removed hundreds of duplicates. Thanks to the Catalog states, I have found several thousand duplicate and similar images. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |